Well, the Iowa caucuses came and went last night, and there wasn't much to change the trajectory of the race in either party.
I think there was only one "loser," and that wasn't by much.
Democrats: No winners or losers
Sanders: Won by proving he could stick with Clinton. But on the other hand, he also had a big turnout of his supporters and didn't win. What happens once this race heads to states that aren't small, liberal and mostly white?
Clinton: With 100 percent of caucus returns, it appears Hillary scored a victory by the tiniest of margins. But really, the result was a tie. Clinton "wins" by not suffering an embarrassing loss, like in 2008. Sanders should win next week in New Hampshire. The big test will be South Carolina, to see if he can compete in a more diverse state.
Republicans:
Cruz: He won the caucuses by a fairly comfortable margin, so he has to be considered a big winner. But in the last two elections, Iowa went to Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum. A good result for Cruz, but he still has much to prove.
Rubio: His unexpectedly strong showing appears to make him the GOP establishment candidate. By hanging right with Cruz and Trump, he was a clear winner here, maybe even more so than Cruz. If he can wipe out the three remaining "establishment" hopes -- Bush, Kasich and Christie -- in New Hampshire, he'll be in a very strong position going forward.
Trump: The lone loser of the night among major candidates, but it wasn't a complete disaster. More like a missed opportunity. A win in Iowa could have set Trump up for an early clinching of the nomination. That didn't happen, but Trump has legitimate excuses: Evangelicals have an outsized influence in Iowa, and he didn't have a strong on-the-ground operation to get out caucus voters. Despite those deficiencies, he still managed to come in second.
Mike Huckabee and Martin O'Malley: End of the road for these guys, who both exited the race. Expect a major narrowing of the GOP field after New Hampshire.
That is also why Hillary is trying so hard to portray herself as the candidate that will carry on the Obama legacy.
Guess Jimmy Carter thinks so too. He's quoted as saying that if had to vote for either Cruz or Trump--Trump would get his vote. Carter qualified it too that he really did not want to vote for either! Here's the link: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/carter-wou … spartanntp 49 more states to go? Please, wake me when it's over.
BTW, in the original post, I didn't make it clear that Martin O'Malley is a Democrat. I thought his campaign would do better than it did, but he was wiped out by Sanders.