Opinions on Grammy Awards?

I had to work so didn't see the telecast.

However, Mumford & Son's "Babel" is an outstanding choice for album of the year, so I'm glad to see that it won. However, there is this Grammy oddity: "Babel" was supposed to be the best overall album of the year but ... it wasn't even the best Americana album. It lost to an album by Bonnie Raitt in that category. Go figure.

I've gotten where I can't stand hip-hop, dance music, etc., (and ESPECIALLY Taylor Swift) so since that's what's big these days, it's probably a good thing I missed the telecast.

What did you guys think? Was it entertaining? Highlights?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-207_162-57568609/gram … for-babel/


Comments are disabled for this blog post.
  • The band called "Fun" did an acoustic rendition of their hit "We are young." I can't find the Grammy video on You Tube, undoubtedly because of copyright restrictions. I did, however, find an alternate video featuring the lovely and talented Janelle MonĂ¡e, who's vocals are fantastic!!! She does a solo verse near the end.

    LoveToCook 02/12/2013 07:07 AM
  • Glad some of us watched. I try to stay at least sort of aware of new pop culture stuff, even if I don't like a lot of it.

    Actually I think there is a lot of terrific music being done by young artists. But for the most part its not what you hear on the radio. My tastes run more toward alt country/Americana.

    There is plenty of great stuff in this area. Besides Mumford, a few others are Reckless Kelly, Ryan Bingham and Corb Lund. And good old-timers too.
    BearinFW 02/11/2013 05:49 PM
  • This is the first time in years that I've watched a complete broadcast. In response to your questions, for me, it was a little too long. Here in CA, the program started at 8pm and finished at 11:30pm; there were so many commercials it was a drag. As for entertainment, I thought the latter half of the program was pretty strong with some great performances. No matter what your taste, that one standout of the night is that there was A LOT of music with minimal chit-chat between performances and short acceptance speeches. The short answer, yes, I was entertained.

    The standout performances for me were The Black Keys, who performed with Dr. John and the Preservation Hall Jazz Band. The performance was excellent--don't know the name of the song they did, but it was great. Following that, I really enjoyed the tribute to Levon Helm of The Band and the cover the musicians did of The Weight. Mavis Staples, no matter who you put her on stage with, always rocks. The last performance that was real memorable for me was Rihanna who sang a duet with a guy named Mikky Ekko (never heard/seen him before). Again, I don't know the name of the song, but the performance was real understated--a keyboard player, guitarist, a percussionist, a stand up bass--there were no pyrotechnics, no dancers, lights, graphics, just the musicians, her and her duet partner. The song was pretty, her voice was lovely, and the duet partner had a real nice voice and he was cute to boot!

    On the fence about one performance: One reason I wanted to watch is that I really like Frank Ocean and I've listened to his channel Orange LP everyday for about the last the last six months. The LP is trippy, so I wanted to see him perform. He did the song Forrest Gump from channel Orange, and I liked last night's version, but hearing it separate from the LP and performed with a funky backdrop on stage--unn, I'm on the fence about that one.

    Your right BearinFW, you did not miss Taylor Swift. She started the show and she had no introduction, so when the show started I truly thought that there was a humorous rift with Cirque du Soleil doing the opening--it was not until she started singing that I realized it was a performance. There was nothing breakout or new with her song, sort of sounded like all her other songs. On a more interesting note, her date (if it was a date) was a woman. Maybe Taylor has realized the reason she's not having any luck with guys is that she really likes women? Now that would make for an interesting song.
    furball 02/11/2013 04:25 PM
  • i'm with fenwaydav. couldn't miss "downton abbey". thomas almost got arrested for being a cocksucker and mr. bates got freed from prison............the grammys can't compete with that!

    i haven't been interested in current music since the 80's, just nothing intrigues me. i'm not even familiar with most of the people on the broadcast. i'd rather listen to ella and sinatra........................
    rae121452 02/11/2013 04:00 PM
  • I enjoyed watching the Grammys for the most part. I still don't enjoy most rap, but there were some really great numbers and excellent stagecraft ideas presented. So much done with projected images. Carrie Underwood wore a silver dress that was maybe 12 feet wide at the bottom and served as a screen on which they projected color images throughout her song.. It began with generalized color patterns and ended with beautiful monarch butterflies fluttering off the dress and the background became a sky full of monarchs at the end. Although I admired the technically intriguing effect, I must say I have no idea of what she was singing; I'm a very visual person.

    Then there was Justin Timberlake's two songs done in early 50s costume (photo) and even in black and white for one of the songs. Reminded me of early Bandstand days. The coreography was very nice for both numbers and included LOTS of background singing and orchestrations.

    And I really like the music from Mumford & Sons - sort of a combo of rock and folk? Good voices and GREAT instrumentation.

    Adele sang and I really like her music.
    rjzip 02/11/2013 12:58 PM
  • Watched Downton Abbey.
    fenwaydav 02/11/2013 02:12 AM
  • Back in my day, pop music was mixed with soul, mixed with country, mixed with jazz.....today, there is no MUSIC...it's all just CRAP. Everything is computer generated...just throw some crap at a piece of paper and you've got a song. No orchestration, no over-dubbing of voices, no VOICES (cuz they now they have auto correct), and no talent. Have you heard Justin Beiber or Rhianna sing live without all the crap behind them? They sound like a bad kareoke night at a gay bar. No talent, no voice....one generation wonders. Tech has allowed these no talent assholes to become megastars for no reason. Grammy's? When do they start giving awards for the best lip sync? At least Milli Vanilli would have been able to keep their trophies....music has died and it's a shame.
    kelleysiland 02/11/2013 01:47 AM
  • Janis Ian won spoken word. Jimmy Fallon won comedy album :)

    As for music, I think it's just become so factionalized and specialized. It's pretty unusual anymore for there to be anything that appeals to a broad cross-section of music listeners. With that in mind, the Grammys probably shouldn't even bother to do overall awards but just stick to awards within genres.
    BearinFW 02/11/2013 01:31 AM
  • Won't watch...there is no such thing as music these days.....the word MUSIC has lost it's meaning. The only award I'm interested in is if Ellen won for best spoken word. Beyond that, the music died years ago.
    kelleysiland 02/11/2013 01:03 AM