I think there are lessons to be learned here for the U.S.
There have been massive protests against same-sex marriage in France, but politicians were undeterred and voted to allow it anyway. This is not an issue you can compromise on: Either you allow same-sex marriage or you dont. Civil unions, while better than nothing, are not the same thing.
Anyway, France bears watching. If, as I suspect will happen, the controversy quickly fades and people just go on about their lives, our politicians will have a firsthand example of how same-sex marriage isn't as big a deal as its opponents make it out to be.
http://news.yahoo.com/sore-losers-cant-accept-fra … 13251.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-22534552
Justice Ginsburg has already hinted as much.
On the other hand, Kennedy did write the opinion on the top gay rights case decided so far - Lawrence v. Texas,
What is so hard for religious people to understand about how a national government chooses to treat people and the way they choose to treat people within their religious structure? What is it that makes them want to impose their particular set of orthodoxy on the rest of us, and against the best intentions of the rest of the nation?
There are 11 countries where same-sex marriage is already in effect nationwide: Canada, Argentina, South Africa, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal and Spain.
Three countries have recently approved gay marriage but it hasn't taken effect yet: Uruguay, New Zealand and France.
Mexico and the U.S. allow same-sex marriage in some jurisdictions. The 12 U.S. states are: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota, Iowa and Washington, plus D.C.
Politically, France is probably the most important country to vote to allow same-sex marriage so far. So I think it's very important that things go well there as an example to other major nations.