Well, just file this one under money talks.
Of course, the right wing echo chamber is going to convince the clown that he scored a great victory for free speech. Well, he may have won, but it wasn't because of that.
A&E plans to air commercials promoting diversity, but ho-hum. I doubt many gay people have had much interest in Duck Dynasty, but if any do, time to give up on this homophobic crap.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/showbiz/duck-dynast … ?hpt=hp_t2
Quoting Bearlyy now:
"Do you think someone should lose their job for expressing their opinion?
Wouldn't that be unfair dismissal?
What about free speech?"
Again, your interpretation of the Constitution is typical right-wing crapola.
I don't agree with what Phil said, but considering he was stating his opinion (no matter how "wrong" it is) on a different platform, and not as part of the show, I don't see any reason for the suspension myself. The only reasonable way we can deal with the whole situation is to boycott the products or the show itself (like we did with Target (for a while) or Chik-Fil-A (not very long), etc).
Just think of it this way.. If you posted some opinion on your personal time, on a public platform, say Facebook, and your boss saw it, found it distasteful in his opinion and fired you from your job, would you go along with that? Sure, it happens all the time, but it would be hypocritical if you feel it's okay in some situations and not in others.
Looking at the viewership figures, I guess we are.
Of course, we knew that Duck Dynasty wasn't going to have the plug pulled on it and the old guy would be reinstated. The show is too popular to just be canceled.
However, A&E caved after only a week, and as a result, the show probably benefited more than it lost from the publicity over the suspension as it had no real negative consequences.