..Romney's account of Egypt embassy incident in doubt
Reuters – Wed, Sep 12, 2012....
....(Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has criticized the Obama administration for sympathizing with radical Islamists after the U.S. embassy in Cairo was breached by protesters, but the accuracy of his account is in question.
At the center of his criticism is a statement by the embassy condemning a film about the Prophet Mohammad that angered Islamists who stormed the building on Tuesday and burned the U.S. flag. The American ambassador to Libya and three embassy staff were killed in an attack in Benghazi to protest the same movie.
Romney said the embassy in Cairo denounced the film - called "Innocence of Muslims" - after the mission in Egypt was stormed, suggesting that President Barack Obama's administration had bowed to pressure from demonstrators.
But Reuters correspondents in Cairo said the embassy posted the statement on its Facebook page on Tuesday morning before the protest began, not after it had started.
A senior U.S. official also said the statement, which condemned "the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims," was released before any demonstrations had begun.
The statement was later pulled from the Internet because it was not coordinated with the State Department in Washington, the official said.
On Tuesday night, Romney said it was "disgraceful that the Obama administration's first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks."
On Wednesday, the Republican candidate again criticized the embassy.
"The embassy in Cairo put out a statement after their grounds had been breached. Protesters were inside the grounds. They reiterated that statement after the breach. I think it is a terrible course for America to stand in apology for our values," he said in Jacksonville, Florida.
Romney campaign officials said that even after the embassy was stormed, it sent several Twitter messages referring to its earlier statement as well as condemning the embassy protests.
Critics, including some Republican allies, said Romney was too quick to use the Libya and Egypt incidents as fodder for a campaign attack before knowing the full extent of what happened in the two North African countries.
His statement on Tuesday broke a self-imposed truce on criticizing the president on the 11th anniversary of the September 11 attacks.
Just for the record, Religulous was a documentary showing inconsistencies and absurdities in a lot of organized religions, and in a relatively civilized manner. The movie in question was simply put, a cheap potshot at one religion, clearly intended to offend. There's a huge difference.
Of course, to you, Erlybrd they are all the same because Maher's a liberal who regularly makes fun of Republican candidates, and hence, is evil and needs to be put down. Even if his documentary did raise a lot of valid points. Cause who cares about truth when it's not on our side, right?
So really, there's no point in trying to have a rational debate over that. Any rationality gets thrown out of the window with a nonsensical irrelevant remark, which Beck or Limbaugh has probably already said before. So, I'll just state my case and let you gloat after you post some FauxNews-inspired cheesy cliche :)
I don't condone the Islamic radicals' storming of the American embassy, and I agree it was clearly wrong, but that aside, I wouldn't support the idiot who made that dumb movie in the first place. I'd gladly offer him to the angry masses. I don't see how their anger is unjustified, with all the hullabaloo raised when Last Temptation and Passion of the Christ came out, was justified.
" I think it is a terrible course for America to stand in apology for our values,"
Yes, I'm sure everyone would agree that burning another religion's holy books and making offensive movies mocking their beliefs is a very American value, while apologizing for mistakes is a sign of cowardice.