Personal Commitment- La Nacional Restaurant, 239 W. 14th St, New York City, New York- July, 27, 1989
Domestic Partnership- Municipal Building, One Centre St., New York City, New York- The Friday before Stonewall 25 in 1994
Civil Union- Putney, Varmont- July 2001 (Google the interview by the LA Times for an article.)
Married- Embassy Suites- Fallsview, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada- October 2005
Today, June 26, 2013 Federal Recognition of us as a legal family.
24th Anniversary July, 27, 2013 Exchanging newly designed rings, Santa Fe, NM
For the rest of us, it's progress. I think that the biggest gay ruling to date for most of the country remains Lawrence v. Texas, which said that the government could not consider us criminals because we are gay.
We can’t just ‘gloom and doom,’ or just wildly party, or stick our heads in the sand, or walk around with a gun because someone might be after us. We need to seek truth and justice. (and not all the justices believe that.) We need to be vigilant. But, ‘We Must Celebrate‘ when it is appropriate or we have a potential of being as rigid as the people in the god business who have no reality in truth... only the dreams of their version of a perfect where perfection does not exist nor should it.
This is why the Supreme Court is eventually going to have to intervene nationally, because the states to come get progressively harder and harder, and in some cases, without federal intervention, marriage rights might be generations (that's multiple generations) away.
Today's DOMA ruling was big, but it really just builds upon Kennedy's two previous landmark decisions. The BIG ONE is probably still a decade or more away.
Are the feds going to afford benefits to married same-sex couples in states where their marriages aren't recognized by the state?
For example: A married couple moves from New York to Texas. Do they lose federal recognition? Say a surviving spouse is drawing Social Security benefits and moves from New York to Florida. Does she lose them? Can a couple from Arkansas who holds a valid marriage license from Massachusetts expect to get federal benefits?
I've heard various opinions on this today, but it is something that is going to have to be ironed out.
Also, going into these rulings, I had not feared the Prop. 8 case, thinking it was going to apply to CA only and didn't pose much relevance elsewhere. Boy, was I wrong, and we narrowly averted disaster on this ruling. The minority view was that the initiative (vote of the people) should hold precedence. If that view had prevailed then it would have essentially said that the public had the right to vote on our civil rights, and that the state constitutional amendment elections were not subject to the review of most courts. We dodged a real bullet here, thanks to, of all people, Antonin Scalia? I about dropped dead of a heart attack when I saw that he voted in favor of a gay rights case. Did hell freeze over?