Thoughts on North Korea?

Do you think this is going to end up in a conflict between the North and South, or will the rest of the world get involved?



To be honest I hope we strike them and take out their regime only for the humanitarian aspect of it. There are 200,000 innocent people in concentration starvation & death camps in North Korea. And I'd love them to be freed. 60 years of this. Not to mention the people of NK are trapped and can't leave. So sad.
Go to youtube and put in "North Korea concentration camps" and you'll see horror stories. Women raped in the camp then having the baby cut out of their stomach. Children beaten *to death* because they were starving and ate a corn kernel, people having their hands and legs tied and a fire lit under them to burn them.
Their only crime being born in a concentration camp. Just horrible and no one does anything. I hope their suffering is over soon.

videos on their suffering. Just pure hell, this is why I hope we strike against their government and free these people




Comments are disabled for this blog post.
  • Isn't it ironic and hypocritical, that the countries which are the most vocal about wanting nuclear disarmament, are the ones which have huge stockpiles of nuclear materials and weapons?
    So, what exactly are we hoping to fight? The Zombie apocalypse? The aliens? Godzilla?
    aliencubby 04/05/2013 12:07 PM
  • We need to totally rethink our preparedness and use of our military. We no longer have a cold war and no one is going to start a nuclear war with us so why do whe have to have a navy,army and airforce that is larger than every country combined? We spend billions to keep our nuclear arsenal ready 24/7. Obama has instituted a four year plan to rid the world of loose nuclear material and is just about completed with that task. The next step in the plan is to start reducing the nuclear arsenals around the world including ours. We have the technology now to see when someone wants to go out their back door to take a piss so there are no big armies coming our way soon to attack us. Let's look at what we need heading into the future before it gets here? do we want to continue like former powers and keep standing armies at the ready 24/7, build castles and forts like they did before cannons showed up? It is time to get smart about what we need and how to use it and even more important how to pay for it. We just signed a treaty with over 150 other countries to stop the selling of arms around the world but already the GOP is going to block the signing of that treaty leaving us with the three other nations that refused to sign the treaty: Syria,Iran and North Korea.
    barney290 04/05/2013 09:12 AM
  • >>So your solution is to "strike them and take out their regime only for the humanitarian aspect of it." Ummmm, doesn't this sound familiar?? <<

    I dunno. I just think about people having their fingers cut off, children beaten to death. people eaten alive by dogs, etc and just wish I could have them freed.
    I'll give a donation to Amnesty International, but they can't do shit. NK wont let anyone in to see anything and they deny the camps even exist. But with Google Maps you can see them

    One is called Yoduk http://goo.gl/maps/qqMgc
    Marc 04/05/2013 01:18 AM
  • I suppose it's possible the North Koreans could do something stupid, however, I don't expect a major international conflict. The Chinese are the major power player in the North, and China has way too much interest in a stable world in which to sell its myriad goods. If the North Koreans get too bratty, China will take care of it.
    BearinFW 04/04/2013 11:38 PM
  • In response to your question, there will not be a military conflict between the North and South, and no other country, by military means, will become involved. There might be a few shots fired, missiles fired, and other overt provocations, no different than those that have arisen over the last sixty years, but no out-and-out warfare.

    In response to your comments, I think it’s a tragedy that innocent people are incarcerated, tortured, and/or staved. North Korea, sadly, is only one of many countries where this is ongoing.

    For some perspective, there are 24.7 million people in North Korea with 200 thousand people incarcerated in some type of living hell. That’s 200 thousand too many people, but less than one percent of the whole population of North Korea. I can think of many countries—including North America--where the percentage of those wrongfully incarcerated is significantly higher. It does not justify North Korea’s actions, but it does give it some context.

    When I read, “take out their regime”, I can only think, “really?”. Taking out a whole regime to rescue 200 thousand people? Morally, sure it may be right, but to play devil’s advocate, at what costs? If you’re going to take down the regime, you are stating starting a war with North Korea. Let’s play war: Assuming a conservative estimate of NK’s armed ground force at 700 thousand, if a war were initiated, you would be looking at a loss of 5 to 10 % of those forces, let’s split the difference and say 52.5 thousand NK ground soldiers killed. The rule of thumb for civilian to military loss is 10:1, so we're looking conservatively at 525,000 civilian NK’s killed. Still, if “we”, meaning the US, are involved, then China and South Korea would become involved. Outside of NK, both SK and China have some of the world’s highest urban population densities (Drop a few sizable bombs in Seoul and you’re looking at catastrophic numbers of civilians killed). Keeping it conservative, let’s only double our number of other than NK military and civilians killed, and we're looking at 1,150,000 million killed.

    You still want to “take out their regime”? Let’s spend money. The estimate for the Iraq war is upwards to 6 trillion dollars in 10 years. How long would it take out the North Korean regime? 1 year, 5 years? Let’s be conservative and say 2 years. Using the Iraq numbers as a reference point, and then figuring in inflation plus the costs of maintaining a force in North Korea beyond the initial build up—$2,000,000,000,000 sounds like a reasonable number, no? OK, we can do a Donald Rumsfield and do it on the cheap for $1.2 trillion; however, for some reason, I doubt if America’s private contractors--fighting for freedom --would let the bids get that low. Just for another perspective, you’re now saying that for EACH person set free from incarceration in NK that the equivalent costs would be 5.75 people killed and $10 million. You feel better now?

    You ridded yourself of the regime, now what? You have a country that’s been led in a centrally controlled government for over the last 60 years. There’s really, in terms of a market economy and sustaining infrastructure, nothing there. You’re going to have the NK’s bereft of money, food, the tools for acquiring those, and lacking some type of social and political structure, go forth boldly on its own? You thought that the 200,000 people being incarcerated there had it bad, you should see what happens when there’s a power vacuum of that magnitude —it’s going to be very much Mad Max and very little Gangnam Style. Somebody is going to have to pay for that rebuilding—where’s the money coming from?

    We can keep playing war, but you get the idea. To me it comes across flippant when people talk about taking out a regime as if they were taking out their nightly trash. Jesus.

    On the three videos, the one video (second video in the post) from Lorber productions is realistic and a good portrayal. Not to diminish the video’s message, but you can make the same video portraying abhorrent incarceration practices in many countries; NK’s are not the only bad boys in town. The AFP video (first video in the post) seemingly tried to be objective but missed the mark. Look at the makeup of its management: http://www.afp.com/en/agency/management-team/. The video would probably have come off without jingoistic undertones if only one person in the management came from the part of the world it was reporting. The last video in the post should come under “it’s my agenda and this is the ONLY story. ” Did anyone actually look at Cornerstone Ministries site? Good grief. The bulk of all the posts are made by one guy named Joe. Again, not to diminish the message, it’s horrible, but far from objective. I’m sure when Joe has set these NK's free, he and his fellow SK evangelicals will be working to save souls and it won’t be gay friendly.
    furball 04/04/2013 07:50 PM
  • In response to your question, there will not be a military conflict between the North and South, and no other country, by military means, will become involved. There might be a few shots fired, missiles fired, and other overt provocations, no different than those that have arisen over the last sixty years, but no out-and-out warfare.

    In response to your comments, I think it’s a tragedy that innocent people are incarcerated, tortured, and/or staved. North Korea, sadly, is only one of many countries where this is ongoing.

    For some perspective, there are 24.7 million people in North Korea with 200 thousand people incarcerated in some type of living hell. That’s 200 thousand too many people, but less than one percent of the whole population of North Korea. I can think of many countries—including North America--where the percentage of those wrongfully incarcerated is significantly higher. It does not justify North Korea’s actions, but it does give it some context.

    When I read, “take out their regime”, I can only think, “really?”. Taking out a whole regime to rescue 200 thousand people? Morally, sure it may be right, but to play devil’s advocate, at what costs? If you’re going to take down the regime, you are stating starting a war with North Korea. Let’s play war: Assuming a conservative estimate of NK’s armed ground force at 700 thousand, if a war were initiated, you would be looking at a loss of 5 to 10 % of those forces, let’s split the difference and say 52.5 thousand NK ground soldiers killed. The rule of thumb for civilian to military loss is 10:1, so we're looking conservatively at 525,000 civilian NK’s killed. Still, if “we”, meaning the US, are involved, then China and South Korea would become involved. Outside of NK, both SK and China have some of the world’s highest urban population densities (Drop a few sizable bombs in Seoul and you’re looking at catastrophic numbers of civilians killed). Keeping it conservative, let’s only double our number of other than NK and civilians killed, and you would be looking at 1,150,000 million killed.

    You still want to “take out their regime”? Let’s spend money. The estimate for the Iraq war is upwards to 6 trillion dollars in 10 years. How long would it take out the North Korean regime? 1 year, 5 years? Let’s be conservative and say 2 years. Using the Iraq numbers as a reference point, and then figuring in inflation plus the costs of maintaining a force in North Korea beyond the initial build up—$2,000,000,000,000 sounds like a reasonable number, no? OK, we can do a Donald Rumsfield and do it on the cheap for $1.2 trillion; however, for some reason, I doubt if America’s private contractors--fighting for freedom --would let the bids get that low. Just for another perspective, you’re now saying that for EACH person set free from incarceration in NK that the equivalent costs would be 5.75 people killed and $10 million. You feel better now?

    You ridded yourself of the regime, now what? You have a country that’s been led in a centrally controlled government for over the last 60 years. There’s really, in terms of a market economy and sustaining infrastructure, nothing there. You’re going to have the NK’s bereft of money, food, the tools for acquiring those, and lacking some type of social and political structure, go forth boldly on its own? You thought that the 200,000 people being incarcerated there had it bad, you should see what happens when there’s a power vacuum of that magnitude —it’s going to be very much Mad Max and very little Gangnam Style. Somebody is going to have to pay for that rebuilding—where’s the money coming from?

    We can keep playing war, but you get the idea. To me it comes across flippant when people talk about taking out a regime as if they were taking out their nightly trash. Jesus.

    On the three videos, the one video (second video in the post) from Lorber productions is realistic and a good portrayal. Not to diminish the video’s message, but you can make the same video portraying abhorrent incarceration practices in many countries; NK’s are not the only bad boys in town. The AFP video (first video in the post) seemingly tried to be objective but missed the mark. Look at the makeup of its management: http://www.afp.com/en/agency/management-team/. The video would probably have come off without jingoistic undertones if only one person in the management came from the part of the world it was reporting. The last video in the post should come under “it’s my agenda and this is the ONLY story. ” Did anyone actually look at Cornerstone Ministries site? Good grief. The bulk of all the posts are made by one guy named Joe. Again, not to diminish the message, it’s horrible, but far from objective. I’m sure when Joe has set these NK's free, he and his fellow SK evangelicals will be working to save souls and it won’t be gay friendly.
    furball 04/04/2013 07:37 PM
  • nice! this is what im hoping for: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/4/us … f-attack-/
    U.S. would seek regime change in North Korea if attack occurs
    Marc 04/04/2013 03:46 PM
  • No, we need to stay out of war in Southeast Asia for our own good. Our military is already compromised by the senseless war in Iraq and the wasted time in Afghanistan.

    Besides, we already burried 33,686 American soldier's in the 50's to free half of that peninsula. Let the half we freed (South Korea) fight for their own country! We set South Korea on the path to develop a great country and they have generally succeeded in doing exactly that. Now, if there is to be conflict, it becomes basically a civil war that we could support with munitions, etc, but we owe them nothing in terms of soldiers to be killed in battle. We've already been there, done that!
    rjzip 04/04/2013 03:25 PM
  • I dunno.. While I'm all for supporting the innocent citizens of North Korea, I don't agree any one country has the right to go invade/"liberate" the citizens of another country (and in the process, set up a standing army/military base there eventually, and maybe exploit some natural resources). Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq.. That's plenty, IMO.

    There are other ways to force them to soften up their stands without the Arms Conglomerate- sponsored violence - embargos, sanctions, blocking aid, political pressure from the UN, etc. And a verbal threat doesn't provide a *valid* excuse for pre-emptive strikes against any political entity. ( cue : This is when you go "So, do we have to sit here, twiddling our thumbs, waiting for them to nuke us and destroy our liberty?").

    And while we're on the topic, why does no one seem to care about helping the oppressed people in some countries in Africa (Rwanda, Uganda, Mali, etc), with its military rule, child militia, genocides, slave trade, blood diamonds, homophobia, human trafficking, etc? Maybe an invasion might be more helpful than clicking "Likes" and resharing Kony-2012 posts on Facebook?

    And let's face it - This is the 21st century. "Liberation" always comes at a cost - be it economic, political, military or otherwise. In the end, all it ends up being, is a euphemism for "Your country is my country's bitch".

    Yes, the gulags and concentration camps, the segregation and hate, the brutality and genocides need to end. There's no questions about it. How we go about helping those people is the tricky and touchy issue. And there are no easy answers.
    aliencubby 04/04/2013 01:18 PM
  • I agree with you guys who say mind your own business when it comes to countries afflicting pain within their own country. This asshole is threatening the USA and our allies and is a whole different ballgame.
    fenwaydav 04/04/2013 10:57 AM
  • The US should keep quiet. To many wars already begun claiming for freedom. Look at Irak, look at Afganistan, etc... To too many people the US have been the evil indeed.
    Prefer finishing Guantanamo, as promised and never done.
    art4you 04/04/2013 09:43 AM
  • This is getting out of hand and their little no ball leader is throwing the whole country into a conflict that will not end up well for North Korea. The U.S. is capable of blowing them off the map and I think it's suicidal for them to continue with these ideal threats. The saddest part of this whole thing is the North Korean people that will be killed if military action is taken. They only know what their leaders are telling them, and their leaders don't tell them anything except that the U.S. is evil.
    fenwaydav 04/04/2013 07:26 AM